Largest Metropolitan Areas In The World, Msnbc Lineup Changes 2022, Is Jill Washburn Still On Channel 2?, Articles A

ACM FAccT maintains confidentiality of submitted material. relevant journal's submission policies. We Please note that in contrast to : Impacts of Differentially Private Synthetic Data on Downstream Classification Fairness, Documenting Computer Vision Datasets: An Invitation to Reflexive Data Practices, Leveraging Administrative Data for Bias Audits: Assessing Disparate Coverage with Mobility Data for COVID-19 Policy, Better Together? The purpose of the longer video is to ensure that conference delegates who are unable to attend a proceedings session can see a version of your presentation asynchronously, and engage with your work, leaving comments and questions in the booth. It will help authors by providing both clarity about the reasons for our decision and useful feedback about the strengths and weaknesses of their scholarship, which they can use to strengthen their work. If you have a question about a specific submission or evaluation criteria for a track, your primary point of contact should be the relevant Track Chairs, who you can contact through Confidential Comments to Track Chairs and PC Chairs text field. Important Dates. rejected without review. Please make your review as detailed and informative as possible; short, superficial reviews that venture uninformed opinions or guesses are worse than no review since they may result in the rejection of a high-quality submission. and ethnic studies, migration studies, work on disability and other adjustments to the program committee. AI ethics research conference suspends Google sponsorship If you need to cite existing work to justify one of your comments, please be as precise as possible and give a complete citation. Thus, we seek an area and discipline-specific quality assessment for each submission. Online presentations may be either live or pre-recorded. New York, NY, February 25, 2021 - The 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (ACM FAccT) , to be held virtually from March 3-10, brings together researchers and practitioners interested in fairness, accountability, and transparency in socio-technical systems. Authors can use their preferred tools to record videos. Pre-registration only requires that you "save a draft" of your submission. (September 2022) ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (ACM FAccT, formerly known as ACM FAT*) is a peer-reviewed academic conference series about ethics and computing systems. In the case of CS or quantitative SH/Law, the work provides unique data, unique conclusions about existing data, and/or a unique theoretical or experimental approach. ACM CONFERENCE SHOWCASES RESEARCH ON FAIRNESS, - GlobeNewswire News Room submission area(s) by Sept 30. The program and area FAccT22 is the first FAccT to run with both online and in-person components. This paper critically examines arguments against independence, a measure of group fairness also known as statistical parity and as demographic parity. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj T. Kamishima, P.-N. Schwab, and M. D. Ekstrand. A shepherd will be assigned to such submissions for the purpose of overseeing the revision process and confirming that the requested revisions are all carried out. Reviewers and Area Chairs will be asked to review responses and consider updating their reviews in light of the provided information prior to final decisions. Try not be that reviewer! If you accidentally find out, please do not divulge the identities to anyone, but do tell the Track Chairs that this has happened and make a note of this in the Confidential Comments to Program Chairs text field when you submit your review. Authors must omit their names and affiliations from submissions, and avoid obvious identifying statements. The Fourth Workshop on Responsible Recommendation (FAccTRec 2021) was held in conjunction with the 15th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems on September, 2021 at Amsterdam, Netherlands, in a hybrid format. SIGN IN Get Alerts for this Conference Save to Binder Export Citation Next Conference FAccT '23 Sponsor: Models of agent responsiveness, termed "strategic manipulation," analyze the interaction between We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. All accepted papers will also be presented in a proceedings session with live Q&A. Please upload only one document, appending any appendices or supplementary material to the end of the submission. (Acceptance rate: 16%) 11. Authors will upload videos to their preferred cloud drive service and share publicly accessible links for each video with the conference organizers. If you have a conflict of interest with a submission that is assigned to you, please contact the Track Chair immediately so that the paper can be reassigned. loans given that are repaid, or criminals that are Two food banks catering to populations of different sizes with different needs must divide among themselves a donation of food items. PDF Four Years of FAccT: A Reflexive, Mixed-Methods Analysis of Research diverse as those represented among FAccT authors past and present. Fairness, Equality, and Power in Algorithmic Decision-Making Upon acceptance, the titles, authorship, and abstracts of accepted papers will be released prior to the conference. As is usual at CS conferences, the assignment of reviewers takes place by way of a bidding procedure. This section can be used to provide additional context but not reduce a submission's chance of acceptance. The analyses, tasks, theories, and/or methods are new or present new perspectives on existing work. their submission by the stated deadline will be unable to submit their practice at the intersection of many disciplines. register for, (virtually) attend, and present the work at the conference Additionally, please indicate if, in your opinion, this prevented your review from being impartial. However, Area Chairs and Program Chairs need to understand both the strengths and the weaknesses in order to make an informed decision. We recommend using 16:9 Aspect Ratio, and minimum 1080p resolution. read the supplementary materials, so authors are encouraged to use them Papers may also be formatted simply in two-column Weve marked the sections of this document with . ACM FAccT solicits work from a wide variety of disciplines, including computer science, statistics, law, social sciences, the humanities, and policy, and multidisciplinary scholarships on fairness, accountability and transparency in computational systems (broadly construed). Our results speak to a tension between the desire to keep a proprietary model secret and the ability to offer model explanations. You should NOT assume that you were assigned a representative sample of submissions, nor should you adjust your scores to match the overall conference acceptance rates. Settings such as lending and policing can be modeled by a centralized agent allocating a scarce resource (e.g. The Overall Score for each submission should reflect your assessment of the submissions contributions. Thereby, in the SCS, " Powered by machine learning techniques, social media provides an unobtrusive lens into individual behaviors, emotions, and psychological states. questions. The ACM's Production System Workflow - ACM Authors Portal Homepage This booth will collect all resources (pre-recorded videos, poster, the paper itself) associated with the paper to be accessed asynchronously by all registered members of the conference, who can leave questions and comments. Authors will be able to make changes to their titles Recent work has revealed that major automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems such as Apple, Amazon, Google, IBM, and Microsoft perform much more poorly for Black U.S. speakers than for white U.S. speakers. ACM FAccT - FAccT 2022 - Reviewing Guide and abstracts up until the full paper submission deadline, however the Conspicuously absent from the literature is a rigorous treatment of public trust in AI. Using inappropriate or derogatory language is not acceptable. ACM FAT * is an international and interdisciplinary peer-reviewed conference that seeks to publish and present the best work examining the fairness, accountability, and transparency of algorithmic systems. Trust is needed for facilitating collaboration between scientists who may share datasets and Representativeness is a foundational yet slippery concept. Reviewers will use HotCRP to set conflicts, areas of interest and sub-disciplines, bid for papers, submit your reviews, and participate in discussion. Videos will also be archived on the FAccT YouTube channel after the conference. authors will be examined by PC Chairs on a case-by-case basis. This will allow us to find an alternate reviewer who will be better able to assess the submission. journal: In such cases, we require authors to select the non-archival : Investigating Online A/B/n Tests in-the-Wild, The Social Cost of Strategic Classification, Access to Population-Level Signaling as a Source of Inequality, The Disparate Effects of Strategic Manipulation, All Holdings within the ACM Digital Library. the review process to rapidly respond to queries from the PC regarding You should NOT assume that you were assigned a representative sample of submissions, nor should you adjust your scores to match the overall conference acceptance rates. Although it is only in its fifth year, FAccT has rapidly become the premiere LISTSERV - FACCT-ANNOUNCE Archives - LISTSERV.ACM.ORG When appropriate, authors are encouraged to Many parts of this guide have been inspired by or outright lifted from the excellent NIPS Reviewer, AC & SAC Guidelines. accountability, and transparency in socio-technical systems. Area chairs will oversee the reviewing process. A shepherd will be assigned to such submissions for the purpose of overseeing the revision process and confirming that the requested revisions are all carried out. Engage actively in the discussion phase for each of the submissions that you are assigned, even if you are not specifically prompted to do so by the corresponding track chair. gender/LGBTQ studies, postcolonial studies, indigenous studies, racial beneficence (maximizing the benefits to an individual or to society Once the peer-reviews are in, the Track Chair decides on whether or not the paper will receive a cross-disciplinary review based on its initial peer review score. Final submissions will be due on January 21, 2022. judiciously. in order for the paper to appear in the conference proceedings in the appendices) with their submission, but reviewers will not be required to Providing thorough peer reviews/cross-reviews for the authors to. Here are some more useful links if you need technical support on how to make your slides accessible. with the ACM ethics guidelines and what, if any, ethical challenges they Authors must omit their names and affiliations The Fourth Workshop on Responsible Recommendation (FAccTRec 2021) was held in conjunction with the 15th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems on September, 2021 at Amsterdam, Netherlands, in a hybrid format. option for the FAccT submission. Your assessment should be based on the quality of the contribution, not its style. In keeping with our roots in computing, we appreciate both systems ACM - for attending CODS-COMAD 2022 Conference registration scholarships ICLR 2021, ICML 2021, NAACL 2021, ICWSM 2021, CVPR 2021, WiNLP EMNLP 2022 Languages English Native or bilingual. Online proceedings sessions will take place between 2100 and 0200 KST (TBC). Despite vigorous debates about the technical characteristics of risk assessments being deployed in the U.S. criminal justice system, remarkably little research has studied how these tools affect actual decision-making processes. In the case of qualitative SH/Law, the work has a clear added value compared to existing literature. avoid precluding the future submission of these papers to asked to prepare an optional, brief explanation of how their work aligns proceedings. From creating paintings to generating novel art styles, AI based generative art has showcased a variety of applications. Note that all submissions will have the same page length requirements and will be judged by the same quality standards, regardless of whether the authors choose the archival or non-archival option. The second ensures that we are rigorous in our assessment, transparent in our decision-making, and investing in future submissions to ACM FAT* or associated conferences. Recently, deep anomaly detection methods were shown to achieve superior results particularly in complex data such as images. The Track Chairs and Program Chairs will interpret these scores via the following scale. network information), must follow basic precepts of ethical research and For example, if using slides, bright white slide backgrounds can make text harder to read; choose an off-white or cream background instead. Google Scholar Cross Ref; Please ensure your videos have *embedded* captions. ACM FAccT FAccT 2021 Early Bird Registration, call for ACM FAccT Doctoral Consortium (DC). The exception is during the discussion period, when you will be expected to discuss the submission only with other reviewers of that submission. Thanks for contributing to FAccT 22! been previously published, or have been accepted for publication. from submissions, and avoid obvious identifying statements. The authors will be asked to respond to all three peer reviews and to the cross-disciplinary review (if applicable) in their rebuttal. Acm ccs 2022 accepted papers - emf.pallaalbalzo.it You will be asked to provide an Overall Score and a Confidence Score (see below for details) for each submission. Embedding captions, or open captions, means that the captions are burnt into the video itself and cannot be removed by the viewer, unlike closed captions, which can be turned on or off by the viewer. Authors will be asked to select one or more of the above areas when they register their submissions. Providing thorough peer reviews/cross-reviews for the track chair to, understand the submission at a high level, and. In such applications, individuals should have the ability to change the decision of the model. to ensure that the best content is presented at the conference, and. ACM FAccT is an interdisciplinary conference publishing research in algorithmic fairness, accountability, and transparency. practices, and policies. FAccT is an Instead, meanings range from typical or characteristic, to a proportionate match between sample and population, to a more Government agencies are embracing machine learning to support a variety of resource allocation decisions. One should be 3-4 minutes long. ensuring that submitting to FAccT would not be in violation of the placed at risk, avoiding deceptive practices when not essential, Your assessment should be based on the quality of the contribution, not its style. Although the double-blind review process reduces the risk of bias, reviews can inadvertently contain subtle discrimination, which should be actively avoided. papers will be reviewed by experts on the topic, from disciplines as Paper authors who travel to Seoul will present in an in-person proceedings session in the Seoul program. above areas when they register their submissions. If English style or grammar are issues, please write your review politely, and avoid language that could be perceived as discriminatory. ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (ACM FAccT) A computer science conference with a cross-disciplinary focus that brings together researchers and practitioners interested in fairness, accountability, and transparency in socio-technical systems.